Science and technology was, is and will be
a lethal tool to rule the world. Science has been the key to the power. The
nation which owns the latest technology can rule the world, it is proved from
the Cavalry archer of Genghis Khan to the modern day nuclear war head. But when we look at the history of the world
Egyptian, Greeks, Roman, Persian, Mongolian, Saracen, British, Dutch,
Portuguese, Chinese, Indian and many others had been the super power in
different periods of the history.
Yet when we talk anybody about a scientific inventions and discoveries or major leap in the scientific development most tent to point their fingers towards the Europe if it is before 18th century and towards the USA if it is after 19th century. This sort of behavior is deep down in our minds. But is this correct? If so, why the non-European nations were super power? For this I think we have to take a journey in the history of Science from the early Egyptians. In this short article I would like to take an excursion about the origins of science, where there the history had been littered with many manipulation and misconception.
Yet when we talk anybody about a scientific inventions and discoveries or major leap in the scientific development most tent to point their fingers towards the Europe if it is before 18th century and towards the USA if it is after 19th century. This sort of behavior is deep down in our minds. But is this correct? If so, why the non-European nations were super power? For this I think we have to take a journey in the history of Science from the early Egyptians. In this short article I would like to take an excursion about the origins of science, where there the history had been littered with many manipulation and misconception.
According to many in the world the
science was begun by Greeks and was developed by the post renaissance Europe.
As the same time all the great cultures like Persian, Egyptian, Chinese and
Indian had no clue regarding the science. But when we look at the history of
these civilizations we can understand how developed they were in the history.
Egyptians were one of the early races before Greeks who were developed in the Science. They were well versed in anatomy (for art), astronomy and astrology, which were inseparably linked in ancient Egypt, biology and veterinary medicine, chemistry, geography, geology, history, law, linguistics, mathematics, geometry, medicine, mineralogy, pedagogy(education), philosophy, physics, sociology and theology [1]. Irrigation scheme of Nile, tall standing pyramids and the mummies are some
example of scientific feat of the Egyptians.
Geometry was applied in the Egypt for tax purposes before the so called
Euclid of Greece wrote the book of The
Elements. Here comes another manipulation of History again in the form of
Euclid. Many text books refer Euclid was a white male eventually from Greece
and lived in Alexandria around three century B.C. But no such person was alive
on this mother earth. The author of this book is a black woman from Alexandria
who lived around fifth century C.E. [2]
From these arguments we can assure that
the Greek were not the first one to begin the Science. Now let’s consider the
development of Science. If we consider the manipulated version of the science
history, we get a wide blank span of time from the Greek civilization to the
renaissance Europe. Where were the text and the sources of these scientific
theorems and formulae? Were they buried in the Mount Olympus? No. They were
translated taken into custody by another civilization which have contributed to
the many of the scientific development and not credited to it. Yes it was taken
into the custody by Islamic Civilization. They hold these texts of Greek until
the crusades [2]. The west claims that the Muslim merely translated the works
of Greek and preserved it. They never did develop the ideas in the text. This
argument is absurd. The Muslims practically ruled from the shore Atlantic Ocean
to the boarders of China. And they just preserved these texts which cost a
fortune with the papyrus technology. Many books from Baghdad Library were
destroyed by the invasion of Mongols over Khwarezmia on 13th century
C.E. But the contributions of Ali Ibn Sina (Avicenna) - whose “The Book of Healing”
was text book for medicine in many medieval universities[3], Alhazen Ibn al Haitham, Jabir ibn Hayyas, Al Farabi, Muhammed bin Zakariyya al Razi, Ibn
al-Nafis were inevitable in the scientific history. Ali ibn Sahl Rabban
al-Tabari was an Islamic scholar, physician and psychologist of Zoroastrian
descent, who produced one of the first encyclopaedia of medicine. Even the
number system we used today was introduced to the word by Arabs, which replaced
the primitive Roman and Greek number systems
Let’s have brief a look on the other
civilizations which contributed to the science. Like the crest on the peacock’s
head, like the gem in the cobra’s hood, so
stands mathematics
at the head of all the sciences. Vedic
literature of Indian Culture is replete with concepts of zero, the techniques
of algebra and algorithm, square root and cube root. Arguably, the origins of
Calculus lie in India 300 years before Leibnitz and Newton. Algebraic theories
was developed by Aryapatta who lived in 5th century C.E. and another
mathematician Bhaskaracharya was the first to was the first to conceive of
differential calculus in 12th century. Most of us are familiar with
Roman numerals. Think you are sitting in a class doing Calculus using Roman
numerals. You are going to write 1788 in Roman numerals it will be MDCCLXXXVIII.
You even can’t think of doing calculus by using this number system. From this
we can conclude that calculus was not developed or used in early Europe.
Ancient India's development in chemistry
was also in a higher level and used in a variety of practical activities. In
any early civilization, metallurgy has remained an activity central to all
civilizations from the Bronze Age and the Iron Age, to all other civilizations
that followed Indian achieved the higher level of metallurgy. By the side of Qutub
Minar in New Delhi, there is an iron pillar erected during Arya Gupta period
around 500 AD. This pillar is 7.32 meters tall, and has a circumference of 40
cm in the bottom and 30 cm at the top. It has been standing in the open for
last 1500 years, withstanding the wind, heat and weather, but still has not
rusted, except minor natural erosion. This kind of rust proof iron (steel) was
discovered very few decades before by mixing carbon with iron [4].
In addition, the Chinese Dynasty in the
Far East was producing gunpowder, paper and establishing printing presses.
Moreover, the Calendar system was introduced by Mayan civilization that is very
famous for predicting apocalypse of the earth.
From the above arguments, one can
conclude that science was not only originated from Greece and it originated
universally. Then how did the story “Science was originated in Greece” came
into play? Moreover, where was it originated? These questions can be answered
in two simple words “Church” and “Power”. From the time when the state and the
church merge, Church initiated the program of distorting history to promote its
power. This technology of falsehood was now applied to “manage” common
perceptions[5]. During the crusades, church captured many text and tent to use
them. But theological aspects would not allow them to use a Muslim knowledge.
Therefore, they manipulated their people by saying that the knowledge Arab had
was belonged to Greeks. Arabs just preserved it. This story enabled the
universities in Europe to use translated Arabic books without contradicting
their theology. But on the Arabs side, it was a different story. They built Bayt
al Hikma (House of Wisdom) in Baghdad; they gathered knowledge from all over
the world, including India, Persia and China. They certainly did not restrict
themselves to Greek sources [5]. But the church spread the word that the
knowledge acquired from the Arabs only had sources to Greeks. So all the
knowledge which was acquired from Bayt al Hikma in Baghdad became the Greek’s,
So did all the scientific inventions and discoveries.
This
theory is being promoted by many scholars of the present too. Here is an
example from Lost in the Cosmos by Walker Percy
“. .as Whitehead pointed out, it is no coincidence that science sprang, not from Ionian metaphysics, not from the Brahmin-Buddhist-Taoist East, not from the Egyptian-Mayan astrological South, but from the heart of the Christian West, that although Galileo fell out with the Church, he would hardly have taken so much trouble studying Jupiter and dropping objects from towers if the reality and value and order of things had not first been conferred by belief in the Incarnation.” [6].
So anyone from any country has the right to say that
their ancestors were also one of the pioneers of the science. It is time stand
up against the “West only theory”. The Europeans not only colonized our
countries but also our education system. They left our countries long ago. Now
it is time to decolonize our education system. And the way we think.
References
References
[1]Dunn,J. Ancient
Egyptian Science retrieved from
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/science1.html
[2] Raju, C. K. Euclid and Jesus. Multiversity.
[4] Science, Medicine, Technology in Ancient India
retrieved from http://www.crystalinks.com/indiascience.html
[5] Raju, C.K. Is
science western in origin?. Multiversity.
[6] Percy, W.
Lost in the Cosmos retrieved from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/a/science_origin.html
To download this article in pdf : http://www.mediafire.com/download/3t811h1njvp8aty/Origin_of_Science_and_the_Crusade.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment